Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Nutrients ; 12(6)2020 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32486496

RESUMO

Vitamin D deficiency is a global health problem due to its high prevalence and its negative consequences on musculoskeletal and extra-skeletal health. In our comparative review of the two exogenous vitamin D supplementation options most used in our care setting, we found that cholecalciferol has more scientific evidence with positive results than calcifediol in musculoskeletal diseases and that it is the form of vitamin D of choice in the most accepted and internationally recognized clinical guidelines on the management of osteoporosis. Cholecalciferol, unlike calcifediol, guarantees an exact dosage in IU (International Units) of vitamin D and has pharmacokinetic properties that allow either daily or even weekly, fortnightly, or monthly administration in its equivalent doses, which can facilitate adherence to treatment. Regardless of the pattern of administration, cholecalciferol may be more likely to achieve serum levels of 25(OH)D (25-hydroxy-vitamin D) of 30-50 ng/mL, an interval considered optimal for maximum benefit at the lowest risk. In summary, the form of vitamin D of choice for exogenous supplementation should be cholecalciferol, with calcifediol reserved for patients with liver failure or severe intestinal malabsorption syndromes.


Assuntos
Calcifediol/uso terapêutico , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Calcifediol/administração & dosagem , Colecalciferol/administração & dosagem , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Sistema Musculoesquelético/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...